Encyclopedia of Mythical Creatures:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Zapan, Infernal King in the Pseudomonarchia Daemonum and the Lesser Key of Solomon

Creature Types: Demon

Mythological/Cultural Origins: Christian, European

Roles/Functions in Lore: King

Literary Sources/Traditions: Grimoires, Renaissance Demonology

Historical/Legendary Time Periods: Renaissance

Attributes/Powers: Authority, Command

Alignments/Moral Standings: Malevolent

A brief account of Zapan’s role in early modern demonological hierarchies

Zapan is listed as a king of Hell in early modern grimoires, notably in Johann Weyer’s Pseudomonarchia Daemonum (1577) and the anonymously compiled Lemegeton, particularly the Ars Goetia, also known as the Lesser Key of Solomon. Despite the authoritative title of king, Zapan’s entry in these sources is not accompanied by detailed descriptions of his appearance, behavior, or specific powers, making him a comparatively obscure figure in the demonological record.

In the Pseudomonarchia Daemonum, Zapan is included among the 72 spirits, a list later adapted and expanded in the Lemegeton. These catalogues sought to systematize the infernal hierarchy, mirroring angelic or courtly models of rank—kings, princes, dukes, marquises—each commanding a fixed number of legions. Zapan’s designation as a king situates him near the upper tiers of this system, implying significant authority, though the lack of elaboration suggests he was either a later addition or a name preserved without narrative development.

Unlike better-known demons such as Bael, Paimon, or Asmodeus, who are described with vivid imagery and detailed functions, Zapan remains largely undefined in surviving grimoires. No mention of a seal (sigil), summoning ritual, or iconographic tradition is attached to his name in major manuscripts or printed editions of the texts.

The origin of the name Zapan remains speculative. It may be a variant spelling or corruption of other names, possibly influenced by Hebrew phonetics or manuscript transmission errors. Some later occult compilations, particularly in 19th-century esoteric literature, repeat his name but rarely add further substance.

Zapan’s inclusion in these hierarchical demon lists reflects a broader early modern impulse to codify spiritual entities within organized systems, even when narrative content was lacking. His presence, despite the absence of detailed traits, underscores the formalist approach many grimoires took in listing demons by rank and number, prioritizing structure over mythology.

Sources:

  • Johann Weyer, Pseudomonarchia Daemonum (1577)
  • The Lesser Key of Solomon, Book I (Ars Goetia)
  • Joseph H. Peterson (ed.), The Lesser Key of Solomon: Lemegeton Clavicula Salomonis (Weiser Books, 2001)
  • Richard Kieckhefer, Forbidden Rites: A Necromancer’s Manual of the Fifteenth Century
  • Stephen Skinner and David Rankine, The Goetia of Dr Rudd